On August 17, 2009, President Obama addressed the Veterans of Foreign Wars:
“But we must never forget: This is not a war of choice. This is a war of necessity. Those who attacked America on 9/11 are plotting to do so again. If left unchecked, the Taliban insurgency will mean an even larger safe haven from which al Qaeda would plot to kill more Americans. So this is not only a war worth fighting. This is a — this is fundamental to the defense of our people.”
This is either true or not true. If true, then winning the war in Afghanistan is fundamental to the defense of the homeland, and there can be no sacrifice too great. Because the last thing we want to be engaged in is a half-hearted, one foot in, one foot out, kind of war. If it is a war of necessity, then there is no question about giving the generals all the troops and equipment and support they need for as long as they need. America’s at war, dammit.
But David Brooks in this morning’s Times just blows past the basic question– do we need to win this war or not? Instead he dwells on Obama’s feelings and his level of determination. Brooks doesn’t believe Obama is really telling us the truth about how he feels about the war. He thinks the president needs to spend some quality time looking at himself in the mirror. “If the president cannot find that core conviction, we should get out now.”
Actually, no. I don’t really care about President Obama’s feelings about the war. I care about his judgment. And if he says we must win this war, then we must win this war. If he’s changed his mind, then we need to have new goals articulated, and we need to achieve them. We can’t just increase or decrease troop levels depending on the president’s serotonin levels.
I do want to know more about what the President means when he says “Those who attacked America on 9/11 are plotting to do so again.” I thought most of those plotters died in the attack, or have been caught or killed since, with the significant exception of Osama bin Laden himself. (How is it that this lunatic, flitting from cave to cave, supposedly on and off dialysis, under constant surveillance from our hundreds of millions of dollars of drones that cruise the area, is able to survive while the comparable uninsured American, during the same time period, has probably suffered the fatal consequences of our patchwork health-care system? Just asking.)
And I’m troubled about the basis for Tom Friedman’s judgment that we really don’t need to win the Afghan war. In the first place, Friedman was such a great champion for the Iraq pre-emptive war and then for repeatedly calling for staying the course “just another six months” that in many circles, six months is now simply referred to as a Friedman Unit. (At last count, the Iraq war, from March 19, 2003 to now has required 19 Friedman Units, soon to be a smooth 20 to 1 error in judgment.)
Now we have a new Friedman measure of progress in the world, from a column this week. Progress is now to be measured by “when a key player in the Middle East actually does something that puts a smile on my face.” Oh Oracle of Delphi, how far we’ve fallen! Somehow the idea that I’m going to be spending the rest of my life peering into that Friedman mustache trying to find traces of a smile makes me, how to put this delicately, have flashes of driving the big white bus.
Friedman blows past the basic question of whether or not we must win this war to keep America safe. Friedman gets the big questions completely backward: the real question seems to be not must we win, but how hard will it be to win: “We simply do not have the Afghan partners, the NATO allies, the domestic support, the financial resources or the national interests to justify an enlarged and prolonged nation-building effort in Afghanistan.” So under Friedman’s logic we wind down the Afghan war even it means the possible destruction of America. Since it’s too hard to win. Gee, Tom. WWII was hard, too.
And that kind of logic ought to be enough to lower everyone’s serotonin levels.
Copyright © 2012 Endleofon All rights reserved
hey big guy … just read this post … you may have read of a time when there was no law west of the Pecos so it became “the” hideout for all sorts of bad guys … too many of them, too much ground to cover and no in-place county mounties … so we never actually won the war … but we did put together a pretty good holding action with Judge Roy Bean and a couple of well-placed cavalary forts …
In my opinion, there is a war between us and lots of Muslin badguys … and we really don’t know how to win it. We do know that the bad guys do get together to train and plot … and they choose difficult geography in areas with no effective government … Afgan, parts of Pakistan, Yemen and Somolia …
until we can figure out how to win the war, I am afraid that american troops will be called on to “keep some order west of the pecos” (or in this case Pecoses) for some time to come to deny/disrupt safe haven.
Nation building in Afgan … not in our lifetime but maybe we can help them pull together some troops to help us a bit. so when we talk about winning in Afgan … it is a non-starter … and points the discussion in the wrong direction. Winning in the US may mean holding actions at best in a whole bunch of places that are not on the tourist maps.
Now Iraq was a totally diffent story. After 9/11 Bush did three very logical things (to me at least: He asked:
1. where are bad guys? Afgan … so we go there.
2. Where are the bad weapons? Iraq and Libya … we went after what was in Iraq (meanwhile, Kadafi said, “holy shit, these guys are serious … so here are my bad weapons … I am turning them in.” and
3. in which of the bad-weapons states is there unpredictable governments? Iraq, iran, libia, north korea et al.
(just as a side note: in my opinion it was good that we found no WMD in Iraq … a point the rest of the world understands as “Uncle Sam says, if you even hint that you have them … expect a visit”
so there is my view of the world … oh and one other thing … why do we continue to try to understand Al Q leadership as “command and control?” They have taken the hint from all those good western management books and are practicing “leadership by inspired vision/virgins”
So the operative questions for smart guys like us is “how do you win a vision-driven war?” Might be a good discussion topic, don’t you think … maybe we could do the Huffpost … hum
Clearly your open minded and receptive to other ideas. Many people in the online community are a little more totalitarian. keep it up :D Of course– and I probably shouldn’t even have to say this– people are free to run their own blogs as they see fit. But I get the highest value from blogs where either the author’s writing is so outstanding that the lack of comments isn’t material a combination of good writing and good comments leaving my personal Research blog if you dont mind wael kfoury
I admire the valuable information you offer in your articles.Just thought you’d be interested to know that I have added you to my bookmarks You make 100% right points in a concise and pertinent fashion, This is a really good read for me, thank you for your time.
I enjoy reading the valuable information you offer in your articles.Great post, You make 100% right points in a concise and pertinent fashion, I will read more of your stuff, thank you very much for writing this
I enjoying reading your post. You make valid points in a concise and pertinent fashion, This is a really good read for me, many thanks to the author one of my articles hope u enjoy reading getting paid for surveys
I see a great improvement in your writing, I’d love to get in touch. Keep up the great work! Your writing is very inspiration.
For whatever reason only half from the submit has been displayed, could it be my browser or the site?
Congratulations for posting such a useful blog. Your weblog isn’t only informative but also extremely artistic too. There usually are extremely couple of individuals who can write not so easy articles that creatively. Keep up the great work !!
Comfortabl y, the article is in reality the best topic on this related issue. I agree with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your approaching updates. Saying thanks will not just be sufficient, for the phenomenal clarity in your writing. I will right away grab your rss feed to stay informed of any updates.
I never, ever thought I would need to be familiar with this thank goodness for the web